| T e n n e s s e e L i b e r a l | ||||||||||||
| P R O C H O I C E -v - N O C H O I C E b y S. L. McKay | ||||||||||||
| Reality Check #2 : When Does Viable Life Begin? |
||||||||||||
| Aldous Huxley’s "Brave New World" tells of laboratories where human life is created. Sperm and eggs are manipulated in artificial wombs; children are not even born to living females. This bizarre fiction of 1939 is no longer far-fetched in the 21st century. Once the stuff of science fiction, humans can now be cloned from a single cell. Doctors now tells us it is possible for a fetus to survive outside of the womb at 20 weeks, providing there is state-of-the-art technology available to keep it alive. A few years ago it was 30 weeks. As science and technology change and expand, it seems that our definitions of what does and does not constitute a complete human being may, too. Yet before we quickly embrace radical reductionism, which, in turn, can lead to absolutism, let’s examine potentialities and actualities. Sperm meets egg. Fertilization occurs and a zygote is formed. Is this a viable human? Or simply potential? Can the zygote survive on its own? Take a step back. Menstruation begins for females at puberty. Are women guilty of killing babies each month for decades unless they seek impregnation? And what of males? Are they guilty of murdering millions of humans each time sperm leaves their bodies without the direct intent of procreating? What of couples who make love using birth control? It was not too long ago that birth control was considered a horrible sin by most religions (still is by some) because it was thought that the only reason for sex was to propagate. And what of genetic cloning? If there is potential for human life from a single human cell, then are people who elect to have billions of cells removed and discarded via nose jobs, breast augmentation, and tummy tucks guilty of killing innocent life? Should we cease using loofah pads and exfoliating creams? Many look to religion to tell them when life begins. Both the Bible and Koran clearly state that an individual life begins at first breath. The Talmud states that life begins at birth. Native American religions also believe life begins at first breath. Most Eastern faiths pay little heed to the temporal physical form, focusing on the soul as eternal. The point is that there remains a myriad of views and disagreements on when any form of life begins let alone when viable life begins. Debate and decision are based on science or faith, or both. Ultimately, it comes down to personal belief. So, in the United States, who decides? Government? Fundamental Christians? The individual? I would never presume that how I conduct my private life is the standard by which everyone else must abide. The arrogance of some, however, will likely persist. Yet I believe most people are evolved enough to understand that when it comes to complex and personal reproductive decisions, the right must remain unalienable. |
||||||||||||
| Back to Tennessee Liberal |
||||||||||||
| Contact | ||||||||||||
| Go to slmckay.com | ||||||||||||